 | | Re: Pirate's Lost Island —Tony Priestman
|
| | | On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Richard Parsons (<Fnn6J4.55G@lugnet.com>) wrote at 05:41:51 (...) What, Johnny Doolittle? Founder of a dynasty of treasure-seeking adventurers, famed for their suave moustaches? (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Johnny Doolittle (was re: Pirate's Lost Island) —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | Tony Priestman wrote (...) Hey hey. I like it. Almost has a Tiberius Flint flavour. Flint the soldier fighting through the ages, Doolittle the Procurer of Obscure Treasures through the ages, currently preying on ships returning to England laden with (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Johnny Doolittle (was re: Pirate's Lost Island) —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Doolittle & Waite). As to communicating with animals, heck, even I can do that (and boy am I sorry, since my proper pirate's bird is yakking his head off at the moment). Bruce (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) Ok Ok, <<rummages for Y2k compliant pencil>> I'll need to build the inside of a London Law firm ... no problem. This guy's getting quite a history. Cool! So he's an associate with a top London firm, (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | (...) Waite any longer. Which is just as well, since Doolittle's wife was fooling around with his partner! As to whether they were barristers or soliciters, ya got me! We only have one form of lawyer here (all at once: And That's One Too Many!). ;-) (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | Bruce Schlickbernd wrote >The pirate babe is his older ex-partner's daughter - she just didn't want to (...) fooling (...) ya (...) Too (...) I'm (...) hostage, (...) So not only is the honest, brave, shrewd Capt John E. Doolittle pursued by the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) The dishonorable and lecherous Captain Lance Boyle, on half-pay, is in the employ of Malcom P Waite, and is in pursuit of our anti-hero. No trick is too underhanded for him, and on top of it, he has the hots for Miss Waite. He has the usual (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Steve Campbell
|
| | | | (...) Don't forget, Doolittle is also pursued by the nefarious Capt. Malcolm Brickering(1) from whom he won the Aurora (formerly the Queen Anne Revamped, re-named, of course, for his Lady Fair, Ms. Waite) in a personal injury litigation on behalf of (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) I forget who started this! Richard? "Arrrr, is a Baroque anything like a Bark or Brig?" The Corsair Bruce (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yea, it's a Bark which has been hit by a full broadside from a 1st rate ship of the line, and now it's baroque in two... (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) And here I be thinking that Baroque be the condition of me swag bag affer I purchase said vessel from Lego wif'out it being on sale. I be such a lubber at times. The Corsair (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Steve Campbell
|
| | | | | | | | (...) HUUURL SteveC LEGO Perilous Pirate Page (URL) moved the Lighthouse! To find out how: (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Bruce Schlickbernd wrote (...) Yeah. Cool, isn't it. (...) I'm writing as fast as I can, but my y2k compliant quill isn't made for this kind of high pressure work. I'll try to knock it out late tonight :-) So far so good, no-one seems to have (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | | | On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Richard Parsons (<FnuGp7.A2@lugnet.com>) wrote at 04:05:24 (...) But you do it so well :-) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, summary —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Bruce Schlickbernd wrote (...) (URL) ;-) Richard Still baldly going... Check out Port Block at (URL) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Royal Ork? nanu nanu So *that's* what you do with those Insectoids aliens--it's "Orson"! LFB (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
