To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 12394
12393  |  12395
Subject: 
Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 17:29:21 GMT
Viewed: 
104 times
  
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote in message <385AA831.A7538733@vfaq.com>...
Yep, and I'll respect that statement.  But I certainly WON'T agree with it.
Putting pics on an open website and then saying "hey don't look at those" • is NOT
the way to run a website.  Don't put them there in the first place, if you • don't
want them viewed.



Yes. You are 100% right. The problem is 100% with TLG. Somebody there is
pretty naive I think. Crazy way to run a company - I have to use get past 2
security checks to read my rather dull e-mail, whilst TLG give the public
easy access to supposedly sensitive data... and then get uppity about it
afterwards.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
 
Yep, and I'll respect that statement. But I certainly WON'T agree with it. Putting pics on an open website and then saying "hey don't look at those" is NOT the way to run a website. Don't put them there in the first place, if you don't want them (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)

116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR