To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 12082
12081  |  12083
Subject: 
Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:10:09 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.org^SayNoToSpam^
Viewed: 
10626 times
  
Eric Kingsley <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote:
> much as some people would like to think.  Some of this is the fault of the
> parent in that they do not encorage problem solving in Girls but some of the
> fault (at least in terms of LEGO) is linked to marketing.  I think that if
> Girls saw other girls playing with LEGO on TV and building things that girls
> would be interested in then girls would actively seek out LEGO.

I guess part of my point is that not only are the Lego Company's current
efforts not a part of the solution, they are ACTIVELY a part of the problem.
Their "for girls" line is their least problem-solving/building oriented, and
conversely, Technic is specifically labelled "boys only".

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
(...) Well I am not going to light you up at all because I agree with most of what you say. I actually think that other than a few slight differences our views on this subject are very similar. I agree that LEGO is not sought out by girls. I really (...) (27 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR