 | | Re: What is a set, philosophically —Sybrand Bonsma
| | | | (...) In my, personal, opinion I own a set if I have the pieces for it, without the same pieces being used for other sets. If I have bought, say set number 1 and set number 2, and with ttheir combined pieces, then either I own set 1 and set 2 OR I (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: What is a set, philosophically —Jonathan Little
| | | | | (...) Obviously, if legos ever become as valuable as collector's pieces as say Barbie and GI Joe from the 50's and 60's, it would help if they were still in an unopened box, with everything complete. Other than that, I agree with Sybrand, that as (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: What is a set, philosophically —Gary R. Istok
| | | | | (...) I always have fun when I buy a set from EBAY. Many times the seller isn't LEGO knowledgeable, and they may have assembled a set. I recently won a few auctions where the sets were 1970's sets. Among them I sometimes find Cellulose Acetate (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
