Subject:
|
Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 1999 04:47:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2092 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks wrote:
> The undercurrent of my feeling on your question, (perhaps obscured a bit by my
> other points), was that once you condone some recent retailers catalogs being
> displayed, that they will become a hot item that people will scramble to see
> and people will compete to display the latest ones. Also that now they are
> taboo this may happen anyway, which would be a bit sad (1)
I personally couldn't give a DAMN about the # of hits to my site, as my site
already occasionally hits the limit, and I can't afford more bandwidth right now.
I wanted (and got) the scans for my own personal use, to peruse and plan what sets
to buy FIRST when they come out.
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: COMPLETE LIST OF NEW SETS FOR 2000
|
| (...) Very possibly so, but it's still a bit disappointing! (...) I try to rarely address my comments specifically to one person - if I can I try to make it impersonal. So while I was replying to your post, I wasn't talking to you in particular. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
105 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
