| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Stanley writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, James Brown writes:
> > > [...]
> > > Bottom line: Those retailer catalogues are the intellectual property of
> > > Lego. If we don't respect them, why the heck should they respect us?
> >
> > YES! YES! Exactly!
>
> By and large, what gives you the impression that they DO respect US?
> [...]
Well, that's not quite the point -- at least not what I was keying in on
in what James wrote. James's point was that our not respecting their
intellectual property gives them less reason to respect us, rather than more
reason, regardless of whether or not they already do. (Do you see what I
mean?)
If we're (as a group of enthusiasts) trying to gain TLC's respect, this
sure as heck ain't the way to do it.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
