Subject:
|
Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 16:15:37 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Selçuk <teyyareci> <sgore@superonline(StopSpam).com>
|
Viewed:
|
84 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in message
news:384E74BE.A847E7FA@umich.edu...
> Wow Frank,
>
> Well stated! I can't argue with that.
>
> One other item of discussion (I'm not sure this was answered, since I'm • having server
> problems, and haven't read all of the lugnet.general posts), Ben had a • 1993 Dealer
> Catalog. Should/can/may he post it, since it's old?
>
> And if TLC does care about the 1993 Dealers Catalog, what about my 1970 • LEGO Dealer
> Catalog, which is a SAMSONITE catalog. I don't think Samsonite gives a • hoot about
> whether it gets posted (since they have been out of the LEGO business in • the USA since
> 1973, and Canada since 1986). TLC shouldn't care, since it's not theirs. • Am I correct
> here?
>
> Gary Istok
Brickshelf has several old vendors' catalog scans. I know it, since at least
one of them, a 1987 one is from me. I don't think it may cause any harm to
Lego in anyway, because they are not different in a way that unleashing any
property of TLC want to keep secret. They are even has less written material
then any normal lego catalog. At least the ones in Brickshelf. And this is
fully my own opinion..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
116 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
