Subject:
|
Re: Technic Half-beam
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Dec 1998 15:05:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
932 times
|
| |
|
|
"Selçuk <teyyareci>" <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> writes:
> Explanation not easy but, just look at this (by the way, do not forget
> checking the whole sit. One of the best Lego fan sites ever, IMHO.
>
> http://w3.one.net/~hughesj/technica/registry/r_beam.html
Well, that said, I still think it's a bad idea to put the whole page
contents on single images, and to put the names of pieces on the images,
thus making the names unsearchable.
And another issue: I've never seen the author discussing the names of
the pieces with other people on the newsgroups. That way, we have three
sets of names for some pieces: The names in LDraw, the names in AucZILLA
and the names in Jim Hughes's element registry. Consistency in the
names would have been a nice thing.
Fredrik
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| Hi: (...) The purpose of putting all of the images into a large graphic had two reasons First, to have the element labels directly associated with the element and have similar elements grouped for easy comparison. I liked the idea of having no call (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| Explanation not easy but, just look at this (by the way, do not forget checking the whole sit. One of the best Lego fan sites ever, IMHO. (URL) Janssen wrote in message <36686c90.7375027@lu...et.com>... (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
