 | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| Explanation not easy but, just look at this (by the way, do not forget checking the whole sit. One of the best Lego fan sites ever, IMHO. (URL) Janssen wrote in message <36686c90.7375027@lu...et.com>... (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| (...) contents on single images, and to put the names of pieces on the images, thus making the names unsearchable. And another issue: I've never seen the author discussing the names of the pieces with other people on the newsgroups. That way, we (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| (...) jasper (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| Hi: (...) The purpose of putting all of the images into a large graphic had two reasons First, to have the element labels directly associated with the element and have similar elements grouped for easy comparison. I liked the idea of having no call (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| (...) Ok, I apologize that I jumped to conclusions too quickly. Thanks. Fredrik (26 years ago, 6-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Technic Half-beam
|
| (...) We have way more than just three sets of part-names. Look at some of the set-inventories. (URL). Steve (26 years ago, 7-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| |
