To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 11150
    Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
    (...) OOoh, and manatees...pesky manatees, they always seem to "attack" boat propellers in the Everglades...evil, ferocious, vicious beasts...! Oh yeah, and dolphins. Always squeaking! Squeak squeak squeak! Assault my ears no more, foul beasts!!! (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears? —Paul Davidson
   Who me? I never put saddles on alligators -- but at least they have studs, like all good Lego pieces should. Polar bears were going to be the beasts of burden and transportation for my Alpine King in his Ice Castle. -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
    (...) That's true, given the use put to them in set 5988 (in dkgrey). One of the consterning things for me about sharks and dolphins is that they were really hard to modify owing to that limited studdibility (is that a word? Coinage alert!). I (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
   
        Re: better scans of the 2000 arctic polar bears? —Tom Boucher
    "Mr L F Braun" <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:3847722E.465B46...msu.edu... (...) I'm (...) Laugh...that was actually on CBS last night here in the US. I'd not seen that one for years. Tom (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR