 | | Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets) —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) Logically speaking, that conclusion doesn't follow.[1] Something being in 63xx-66xx means that it definitely is Town, but something not being 63xx-66xx doesn't necessarily mean that it's not Town. For example, 9 of the ~23 Ninja sets are in (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets) —Thomas Main
| | | | | Todd Lehman wrote: <snipped well mapped out discussion of set numbering theory> (...) OK, I have looked at the new catalog in some detail but I can't see where everybody is getting the label "Futbol" for these sets. I am obviously overlooking (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arctic is Town (was: Re: My Analysis of the 2000 Sets) —Jeff Stembel
| | | | | (...) year (...) Where did this come from? I haven't seen anything that says "Futbol" in the catalog, and frankly, I don't think Lego would be dumb enough to refer to the soccer sets this way in the US. It would create way to much confusion. Jeff (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.town, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | | | | |
