 | | Re: When did the "fingernail groove" appear?
|
|
(...) According to peeron (not definitive, but certainly a good indicator) there's a fairly neat split around the end of 1994 - (URL) those without grooves> do not appear in any sets after 94, and (URL) those with grooves> don't appear in any sets (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | When did the "fingernail groove" appear?
|
|
Hey all, After another major re-sort of my collection, I decided to separate all the 1x2 grille tiles without the fingernail groove out of my big bag of the grooved kind since it's kinda hard to tell 'em apart while digging. I was surprised to find (...) (21 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) This is probably my biggest issue with it as well. When I hear the word 'fan' I have a hard time disassociating it from 'fanatic'. Also, I work in an environment where I'm besieged with acronyms daily... sometimes two or three per sentence. I (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Announcing... The First Joe Vig Contest !!!
|
|
(URL) Announcing... the First Joe Vig Contest!!! ======== You will find all the contest information on (URL) The First Joe Vig Contest> page. This contest does not begin until June 1st, 2005, so please don't post your entries before then. (The (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.build.vignette, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.build.contests, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Suz's drive-by butt-in.. I don't use AFOL in ref to myself because I don't like it either. Not that it's -horrible-, but I don't feel as though it covers me. "Fan" implies "fanatic", which I'm not. (Though I certainly was ten years ago..) Plus (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:IH42Lw.1wsw@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) would seem (...) dedication than (...) .. (...) [... snipped ... ] Yes, I believe you are correct, it is the term "fan" I have an issue (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Let's replace "AFOL" with "ALE"
|
|
(...) It's not just you, Mike -- I feel much the same way. (David replied) (...) I'm sure there are such cases, but from what I've seen, the majority of people in this community really are much more enthusiastic about LEGO bricks than clone bricks. (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I personally dislike refering to myself in accronym form. Accronyms are pretty much an indicator of complete geekishness, which, when cruising the beach for babes, I try to avoid. I usually say "LEGO Fan" and "LEGO Fan Community", and then (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) What aspect of the term do you feel is inaccurate? From your post, it would seem that you object to the word "fan", because it implies a stronger dedication than the word "hobbyist"? Of course, the resulting acronym with "Hobbyist" is .. uh... (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
"Jason Spears" <spielboyAT@gmail.com> wrote in message news:IH3xAr.st8@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) enthusiast. And (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I posted a few weeks ago regarding my feelings of the term "AFOL": (URL) my post, I don't think (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I'm in agreement with you on this, I'm not so much a fan, as an enthusiast. And I describe myself to others as such. (...) Sure, if enough of the community recognized that one particular acronym was better. Shifting gears isn't easy but can be (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Looks like my first post was in Sep 15 1996, cool. jt (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Old??? You're a living fossil! :-) JOHN (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
I guess that makes me old : ( Google shows a post from Sept '93 as my oldest... (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I did some looking and found June 1997 was mine but I -know- I was browsing before then, like early 1996. Adr. (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Wow, missed beating out Nephilim by THAT much. let's trim lugnet.faq off the FUT, ok? (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) My first post to r.t.l. was August 9, 1995. Good grief. Russell BayLUG/BayLTC (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
Wow, I looked up my posts, and the earliest they had was May 11, 1998. Though that was a post from Larry about my liking the jeep in 6405, so I know I must have posted earlier than that. Not too much earlier, though, as it was Brian Kendig that (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
This is a good question -- as a relative newbie to the community, I've often regretted that this is the standard acronym. It's pronunciation is unclear; I've heard old AFOLs say anything from "A.F.O.L." (i.e. just spelling it) to "A-full" (long (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) My earliest post was 29 Nov 1995 - good grief! .s (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
