 | | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:IH42Lw.1wsw@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) would seem (...) dedication than (...) .. (...) [... snipped ... ] Yes, I believe you are correct, it is the term "fan" I have an issue (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Let's replace "AFOL" with "ALE"
|
|
(...) It's not just you, Mike -- I feel much the same way. (David replied) (...) I'm sure there are such cases, but from what I've seen, the majority of people in this community really are much more enthusiastic about LEGO bricks than clone bricks. (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I personally dislike refering to myself in accronym form. Accronyms are pretty much an indicator of complete geekishness, which, when cruising the beach for babes, I try to avoid. I usually say "LEGO Fan" and "LEGO Fan Community", and then (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) What aspect of the term do you feel is inaccurate? From your post, it would seem that you object to the word "fan", because it implies a stronger dedication than the word "hobbyist"? Of course, the resulting acronym with "Hobbyist" is .. uh... (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
"Jason Spears" <spielboyAT@gmail.com> wrote in message news:IH3xAr.st8@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) enthusiast. And (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I posted a few weeks ago regarding my feelings of the term "AFOL": (URL) my post, I don't think (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I'm in agreement with you on this, I'm not so much a fan, as an enthusiast. And I describe myself to others as such. (...) Sure, if enough of the community recognized that one particular acronym was better. Shifting gears isn't easy but can be (...) (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Looks like my first post was in Sep 15 1996, cool. jt (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) Old??? You're a living fossil! :-) JOHN (21 years ago, 26-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
I guess that makes me old : ( Google shows a post from Sept '93 as my oldest... (...) (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: About the term "AFOL"
|
|
(...) I did some looking and found June 1997 was mine but I -know- I was browsing before then, like early 1996. Adr. (21 years ago, 25-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
