 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes! (...) Because Lego encourages creativity and is a toy which can grow with the child. (...) I'll answer cynically here. I'd make more models that have value added when put together. I think the bonus SW minis were a good example of this. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) I agree with Kelly on this - You appear to be having trouble getting the company to realise how many of us there are and, most importantly, how much we are trying to get our points/wants across. If you had asked me how many responses to the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. Currently, that is the bulk of my purchases. Duplo is where my money is spent right now. I find that anything purchased for me is usually bought via eBay or AuctionBrick. (...) Twin niece and nephew. I have to do something to help (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes (...) Because they're versatile and inspire creativity. (...) More light/motion features in regular building sets. Integrate some small motorised or technic features into smaller town/space/train sets. This would make them more attractive (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, I would. Actually, I am buying lots of Lego for my own child (which will be born around july 1st) and for several other children. (...) Because I believe that apart from the play value of Lego, the building system helps children to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) For the same reasons I buy it for myself: It's a quality & fun product that encourages creativity and thinking. (...) As a fan of LEGO Technic, I'd say: more "features" - more things moving and acting like the real-world objects. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, if I was buying toys for someone 0-11, I would definatly consider lego. (...) Because there is some good products on the shelves at the moment. (...) Change the focus away from things that emphasize play and back to sets that emphasize (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Y (...) They are fun toys, and they are also educational, as they teach kids to solve 3-dimensional problems encountered in building and to apply their ideas to the physical world. (...) More Lego parts that are fully compatible with existing (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: (snip) (...) Yes (...) Kids love LEGO products, even if they don't know it yet. (...) A parts list in the set, like some of the Designer sets have. Instructions for multiple models Instructions for models (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Lego company survey now on LegoFan.org
|
|
Interesting. I also took it on Firefox/XP, yet I didn't get anything like Q23/24, about decreased spending. It's too bad, too, as my 2004 spending was less than 1/4 of 2003, and 2005 has been nil except for pre-2004 sets and Duplo that doesn't have (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes, I am buying Duplo right now. (...) I have to start corrupting my nephew as young as possible to keep him away from video games. (...) More fan interaction - the US Truck Tours have *always* made a good local splash. Use those tours for (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. I have in the past, and I'm sure I will in the future. (...) The best toy makes the best gift. (...) I'd like to say, "I would give people the opportunity to upload CAD models and then have them made and buy them in real life," but that's (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Poll: Did you complete the TLC questionaire?
|
|
(...) Yes, what Lar said. I knew we'd easily make 150; I thought that if people filled out the survey and then voted on the poll, it would reflect a FAST and ABUNDANT response that we all could tangibly see, but since Jake already posted and TLG (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: New Poll: Did you complete the TLC questionaire?
|
|
(...) Totally agree. But I think John was trying to measure whether "we made it or not" ... per Jake's "holy mackerel!" post, I'd say "easily"... (which is awesome!) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Constantly. I send LEGO to people in every age group up to their fifties. If I had friends older than that, I'd send them LEGO too. (...) Because LEGO is the toy that never dies, no matter how hard the marketing guys try to screw it up by (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: LEGO changes the Minifig helmet again?
|
|
(...) I checked out my own Rascus (the red guy) helmet and compared it to an older motorcycle helmet and I see no difference what so ever. Regarding the floppiness, all of my KK2 helmets (barbie blue, green and red) were floppy from the start, and I (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) I believe that LEGO makes intelligent toys that broaden a person's creativity and 3D visualization skills while also being fun to build and play with for people of all ages. (...) I would bring back the flip-tops that let you see (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: **snip** (...) Yes (...) Lego is a fun and creative toy. No kid should grow up without Lego. (...) Lego doesn't need "features" unless you count going back to its roots a feature. Lego is all about building, not (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Lego company survey now on LegoFan.org
|
|
(...) -snip- (...) Yessirree! I made it :-) (the true "online-fan" checks out the sites for new info several times a day, in fact, everytime a connection is available, or can be got to, unless it is building-time, of course! (in which case even the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
|
(...) Yes! (...) Because Lego is more than 'one toy'. With enough imagination You can build anything, play with it, and then build something else. Try to do that with 'Action Man' (or whatever) Because Lego keeps it's value. The bricks don't 'get (...) (21 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|