|
|
 | | Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
|
| (...) Hmm. My mistake. I thought you could renew patents, but I guess not. (...) Those are pretty neat! Dave! (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
|
| (...) Uh-- did they really 'allow' it to expire? I was under the impression that the patent lasted 20 years, then 'tough noogies'. 1958 was the patent year for the stud-and-tube system, so 1978 would fit the bill... I was interested to see some of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: MOC: Motorized Cows
|
| (...) Fantastic!!!! I am hoping you won't mind that these little cows will get copied for every train show from now on. Is anyone going to have time to make some for BrickFest? I really hope so. JB (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build, lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
|
| (...) Goodness. I can think of close to a dozen brands that use some variation of the tubes-and-studs clutch system, so recognition could definitely be a problem! (URL) This item> has been mentioned previously on LUGNET, but it seems relevant to (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Trademark defense doesn't work vs Mega Bloks
|
| (...) This won't likely happen. Previous lawsuits have ruled that MEGABLOKS has erred in marketing its product in a way that can confuse the buyer into thinking that MEGABLOKS are affiliated with or endorsed by LEGO. Therefore, for close to a (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-04, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
