|
|
 | | Re: A fan no more
|
| (...) Well, I think the issue isn't that kids are any dumber or less creative than they used to be-- it's just that Lego is aiming for a different market. Back when I was a kid, there were a few other kids I knew that played with Lego. A few. Almost (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A fan no more
|
| "Thomas Main" <thomasmain@myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:I0JJwE.o1F@lugnet.com... (...) catalog. I (...) browsed (...) action (...) design (...) contrast, the (...) image. (...) This (...) and the (...) but (...) them as (...) at the (...) (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A fan no more
|
| (...) You're not alone, David. I'm in the exact same boat. I don't like the new set designs, and the parts come in the wrong colours, so there's not much point in buying any of the new sets! Apart from buying the occasional "display piece" that Lego (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A fan no more
|
| In lugnet.general, David Simmons wrote: <snip> (...) I had very much the same reaction after looking at the Summer 2004 catalog. I couldn't put my finger on exactly why I didn't like that catalog until I browsed a catalog from 1987 that I had just (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: A fan no more
|
| (...) Oh yeah *that thing*. I recall getting a copy of that in the mail the other day, but after two minutes of flipping through it, I put it into my not-so-coveted 'shred pile'. I admit there are a few interesting bits in there, (including a few of (...) (22 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
|
