 | | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) I don't need my newsgroups to be pretty. Boring can be ok. (1) I need them to be usable, full of content (ie text) and provide me links to the pretty pictures I want to look at. (1)Apparently LEGO thinks old grey and realistic castles are (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Sure. And worse. Like I said, *BB isn't very nice. (...) Now there's a non sequitur. Are you suggesting that virtual reality immerse chatrooms will replace discussion boards? Probably eventually, but not completely -- and, y'know, not in a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) I like the thread thing, but I haven't really missed it at Classic-Castle. I imagine that more specific topic areas and enforcement keeps threads from becoming wandering safari hunts sometimes strewn over numerous forums. The graphic avatars (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) <snip> What exactly does it mean to be "community owned"? Is the site going to be like a WIKI and anyone can change the content? Is there going to be a controlling body (say, for example, of 9 people) who are going to make all the decisions (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.build, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.publish, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
|
|
(...) Yeah, fair enough. I didn't really mean to slam your work; I just wouldn't like a BB-style forum to "replace" the Lugnet group. (22 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
