 | | Re: What a downer :-(
|
|
(...) I was under the impression that all the problems being listed in the post(s) I replied to were related to the short attention spans being cultivated in new generations these days. Addiction to one form of entertainment may be bad, but it's a (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: ABS... but which one?
|
|
(...) I didn't say that; perhaps I was not clear enough. What I meant was: brand new bricks bought 10 years ago (before the claimed ABS change), and brand new bricks bought *now* click different from each other. In fact, the more recent ones don't (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ABS... but which one?
|
|
In lugnet.general, Pedro Silva writes:> (...) I fail to see the logic in this statement. These stories talk about how older bricks *today* click differently than new bricks *today*. But I have seen no reference to how well old bricks were when (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ABS... but which one?
|
|
(...) Great research, by the way. I would have taken longer to find out LEGO references in Bayer's website, mainly because I were not *expecting* there would be any... turns out they are proud of their role as suppliers - and they have reasons for (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: ABS... but which one?
|
|
(...) Thanks for posting your experience, Allan. What I'm curious now is knowing how the more recent bricks will be in 25 years. If they look "less good" than the previous at this point in time, perhaps in 25 years they will have become *wrecks*. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
