 | | Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
|
(...) Oof! You wound him! Actually, don't get me started on the volumnuous (sp?) merits of Brikwars ... I can extemporaize for hours about this wonderful system, and I still haven't even gotten on Mike's payroll yet. -s (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
|
(...) Hello Mike (and Shaun), Where do I begin? I am _really_ sorry the way that came out. I really do enjoy your Brikwars rules. In my fervor to gush about the Chainmail rules, I gave your ruleset a back-hand slap, and I apologize. I don't want to (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: New fantasy battle rules....
|
|
(...) Ha ha it's all good, I was just joking around about the wound and all. Secretly I half agree with you - by coincidence I was just having a conversation with Dave Brown a few days ago about how professionally-written BrikWars isn't, taking the (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Beater Beta testing (was: New fantasy battle rules....)
|
|
(...) Ooh ooh! Do you need beta testers or is it all done in-house? If you do need a nother bod to look over the rules this nerd^2 will be happy to oblige. James (another name for a nerd is a square... hmm square squared?) (24 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Beater Beta testing (was: New fantasy battle rules....)
|
|
(...) Right now my computer's all busted up from trying to install win2k (dumb move, I know) - hopefully I can resurrect it fast enough that we won't get knocked off-schedule. I'll put your name down for the second editing round. (...) Sounds like (...) (24 years ago, 22-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
| |
| | Re: Beater Beta testing (was: New fantasy battle rules....)
|
|
(...) Thanks. Good luck with the computer resurrection, hope you didn't lose anything in the switch. (...) Always thought there was more to the Lego-gamer than met the eye, now i realise it's another dimension. (...) (24 years ago, 24-May-01, to lugnet.gaming)
|
