Community : 330


Fun / Community / 330	329 \| 331

Subject:	Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org
Date:	Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:41:21 GMT
Highlighted:	(details)
Viewed:	15 times

In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Kyle D. Jackson wrote: <snip> > So for everyone who disagrees with the existence of LUGNET.Lavender, or > any previous group that may have crossed the Line, I have this > suggestion: > Vote with your wallets/participation. It would be interesting > to tally up all of the bandwidth required by LUGNET for non-LEGO-specific > traffic, and compare it to the total. (For sure all the drivvle in rtlToronto is a > quarter of it! ;] ) Now think of your membership fee and donations > to LUGNET. A percentage of that is going to support those non-LEGO-specific activities. > How does that make you feel? Is that what you expected when you sent in the money? No, what I expected when I joined LUGNET, was part resource, part discussion. .space mostly. I saw it as a place to exchange building ideas and maybe a little banter. But what I got was at least 10-fold better. The single biggest surprise for me was .off-topic.debate. I can't imagine having a week without some heated discussion going on (and am sad when there isn't one). –Can I mention here that I still miss hop-frog?– I've learned a lot, and been directed to resources I would never have been exposed to had it not been a part of LUGNET. I am very grateful for it's existence and it almost never has to do with Lego per se. Hell, I've swayed my opinion over the second amendment because of things presented on those forums. If it were to be trimmed off because of it's lack of Lego-talk, now there would be a major disservice. So if Todd wants to further compartmentalize parts of LUGNET, more power to him. If you want a .kyle, more power to you! (provided you mean it) There should be .lavender. If something is planted and it dies on the vine, then it should be cut. But it should be given a chance and not dismissed out of hand. If you feel that sections of the community are useless then don't subscribe to them. What is so difficult about that? -Evil Wayne

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
(...) Wayne, I don't know if your question is meant to be rhetorical to the general members, or if it's directly specifically at me. If the latter, then unfortunately it reads like you missed the point of my post (or I failed to make it well). I was (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)

Message is in Reply To:

		Is LUGNET what you really want? (Was: Re: Lavender Brick Society)
(...) Wow, controversy on LUGNET. Will wonders never cease? ;] Damn I'm going to regret this. Oh well, as long as my post is more coherent than JAL's, I've done good. ;] I have formed a theory. Here's a pictorial representation of part of my theory: (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.people, lugnet.org)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search