To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.fun.communityOpen lugnet.fun.community in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Fun / Community / 317
316  |  318
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:07:04 GMT
Viewed: 
18288 times
  
In lugnet.fun.community, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> In lugnet.fun.community, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> 
> > I won't swear to it, but I think that puts you in the Pit of People Condemned to
> > read Reader's Digest for All Eternity.  If it didn't have any sugar in addition
> > to being decaffienated, you'd simply be an atheist.
> 
> Oh well, no worries :-)  Shocking thought it may be, I *like* Readers Digest.
> Anything with words on a page can't be all bad, right?

I always liked my mother's succinct summation of Reader's Digest: premasticated
literature.  But I must admit, the Groucho Marx Dilemma would be woise (Help,
help, let me out of here!  At least throw me a magazine).

Locked in a bathroom for eternity with nothing to read but the laxative labels.
Brrrrrrrrrr.

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Oh well, no worries :-) Shocking thought it may be, I *like* Readers Digest. Anything with words on a page can't be all bad, right? It could have been worse. It could have been the same cornflake package for all eternity. At least with RD I (...) (22 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR