 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) My personal feeling is that the "LEGO community" doesn't really exist. That is to say there isn't a singular entity that can qualify to classify the group that might make up this definition. But rather, in my mind what you might really be (...) (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Certainly anyone who does is welcome, but perhaps being a part of the community, or one of many 'LEGO communities' is a matter of individuals actively identifying with such groups...? -Tim (21 years ago, 10-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Return of The Random LEGO Set Name Generator
|
|
(...) I see 204,938,448 set names are possible... I wonder how long it will be before they're all listed on this thread :-) Cheers Richie Dulin (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes: SNIP (...) HUGE SNIP (...) basically, any one that plays or works with ANY Lego building product. Jeff (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| |
| | Re: Return of The Random LEGO Set Name Generator
|
|
Awesome! A combination of Pirates and Belville gives some pretty fun results. My current favorite being "King Kahuka's Playmates." Bryan (21 years ago, 9-Apr-03, to lugnet.fun)
|
