 | | Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
|
|
(...) Er, ah... I mean THIS QUESTION, which deals with Todd's property rights... NOT the ENTIRE FAQ, although that's the way it read to me when I re-read it... (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
|
|
(...) prolly. I said intense because it was nuanced, not because there were hard feelings. I DID get a little frustrated at myself because every time I thought I had the nuances grokked and I restated what I thought I understood, I didn't quite have (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Hornet multi-role fighter
|
|
(...) I'd go .publish... Well within that charter. (...) Yes. But in addition to being in the TOS, it's actually stopped by the news server, so it's not just prohibited, it's prevented. (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Hornet multi-role fighter
|
|
(...) Why not lugnet.publish? (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
|
|
(...) Hey, you almost make it sound like there was some kind of heated discussion/ argument/debate or something. I thought it was all very civilized, with mostly just questions and answers and things. (Were you holding back anger or frustration?? (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
