To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / 640
639  |  641
Subject: 
Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.faq
Date: 
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 18:47:14 GMT
Viewed: 
2642 times
  
In lugnet.faq, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) writes:

Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
It's an acronym (well, a pseudo-acronym):  [L]EGO [U]sers [G]roup [NET]work

So how do you feel about "LUGnet"?

It does place the syllabic emphasis correctly, but it still looks very wrong
to me, and I think it leads to people writing all sorts of other mis-
capitalizations.  I've seen all of these, for example:

   LUGNet
   LugNet
   LugNET

and I think many of those came from people seeing other people write it with
some mid-word capitalization thing and not being able to remember exactly
how it was supposed to be capitalized.

I'm not bothered much if it's written like that in a newspost, but whenever
I see it turn up on a web page like that in anything that's not all caps, I
tend to write the author of the page and ask them to correct the
capitalization.  And it always appears on the lugnet.com website either in
all caps (in natural-language text) or all lowercase (in geek-stuff like
URLs and newsgroup names).

Anyway, the pronunciation of LUGNET is not:
   'lug-'net (with equal emphasis on both syllables, as in "lug nut" or
   "dragnet").

And it's not:
   lug-'net (with emphasis on second syllable, as in "brunet").

It is:
   lug'-net (with emphasis on first syllable, as in "magnet")

(Of course, the phonemes in the "net" portion of "magnet" are different,
since the "e" is a silent schwa-e in "magnet" and the "e" in LUGNET is a
short-e just like the plain word "net.")

Another problem with LUGnet is that LUGNet is actually technically closer
to the right thing:  LUGNet breaks apart visually into L U G Net, while
LUGnet breaks apart visually into L U Gnet.  :-(

--Todd



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
 
(...) Whoops, I should clarify that... The problem with it is that although it places the syllabic emphasis on "lug," it still gives "net" its own prominence by its being a different type-case. That is, it greatly separates the two halves of the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
  Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
 
(...) Hmm. That certainly seems to be the most natural pronunciation. But then again, I'd pronounc Lehman "Layman". :) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
  Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
 
(...) I just saw "KPNQwest" in the headlines and it reminded me... Another reason the capitalization "LUGNet" is icky is because it has a higher chance of being mispronounced similar to "PSINet" and other similar names. If you remember those PSINet (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.faq)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: autoFAQpost /general/~u.can_i_use_lugnet_name_or_logo.en.faq
 
(...) So how do you feel about "LUGnet"? (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR