 | | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Robert Munafo: (...) The HTML-to-text converter already exists (lynx -dump), and it inserts footnote-like[1] references in the text, so there isn't a serious need for repeating URL's as plain text. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Wow, that's great! That's actually the perfect thing to do. Somehow I was led to believe someone was writing all the LUGNET tools themselves and that everything inside angle brackets would be invisible. So, let's see -- that means I can (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Nah. Don't worry about it. I'm taking the position that individual FAQ items written or edited by an individual might as well carry some of that individual's stylistic techniques -- "stylistic techniques" to me means things like writing style, (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
(...) Actually, we were doing just that. We were ready to come out in the open with our stealth ASCII technology, but then the USAF needed some of it to bomb someone, and we couldn't talk about it for at least until the media stopped getting (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Usable HTML tags (Was: 202 FAQ items posted to lugnet.faq)
|
|
Hey, while you're at it, will you write one that makes people buy LEGO sets and send me just the 2 x 2 tiles? They can use an envelope or a box, I don't care. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
