Subject:
|
Re: Volume of bricks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.faq
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Apr 1999 17:40:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@geocities.com&AvoidSpam&
|
Viewed:
|
1288 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Dee wrote:
> In a fit of boredom, I worked out the volumes of bricks once,
> studs were not included in the calculations. 1x1, 1x2, 1x3,
> 1x4, 2x2, 2x3, 2x4 and 1x6 were done. Even though the
> volumes are at best approximate, would anyone want them for
> the dimensions section of the FAQ??
It couldn't hurt.
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@geocities.com>
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Horizon/5249/
"I prefer the term para-mental. It keeps me out of the loony bin."
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Volume of bricks
|
| In a fit of boredom, I worked out the volumes of bricks once, studs were not included in the calculations. 1x1, 1x2, 1x3, 1x4, 2x2, 2x3, 2x4 and 1x6 were done. Even though the volumes are at best approximate, would anyone want them for the (...) (26 years ago, 3-Jan-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
