To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.faqOpen lugnet.faq in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 FAQ / *978 (-5)
  Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) are (...) should (...) haven't (...) Im sorry if it sounded sexistic, it was not my intention. I really thought it had almost the same (cant find the word) as "NLF: Non-Lego Friend/Fiancé/Fiancée" The dislike (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version
 
(...) You're joking, right? That's kinda sexist (IMHO), and an acronym FAQ should (IMHO) try to document popular accepted usage, not add new things that haven't reached some critical mass of usage. --Todd (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: Acronym FAQ - FTX version
 
I noticed the NLF acronym... Maybee this one can be usefull for us who are married ;-) "WAF" "Wife Acceptance Factor" I have to consider this factor each time i buy something not really important... Or when you move the furniture around the house to (...) (24 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: TRU?
 
(...) use (...) Like i couldn't of figured that out for myself, pshh. :o) But seriously, they never have train stuff, well at least the one at dufferin mall doesn't, and i find that whenever i go there, wal-mart almost alkways has the same thing but (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.faq)
 
  Re: TRU?
 
(...) ...plus, if you need to encrypt any other acronyms, you might be able to use this: (URL) .faq (24 years ago, 1-Sep-00, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.faq)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR