 | | Re: About that FAQ ...
|
|
(...) I hereby announce that I will endeavor to slurp these questions into the LUGFAQ. And my hearty thanks go out to Jim Baker, for his previous work on the project. If anyone would like to supply answers to any of these, please post them! :-, (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: When are we going to see a "Work in Progress" copy?
|
|
(...) That all depends -- how much money are you willing to part with? :-, I have roughly 25 items (plus the Auction & Shipping FAQs, plus the not-yet-converted LDraw FAQ) so it's kinda thin right now. And there needs to be some work on LUGNET's (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Lingo and dialects (Was: Stub error (2002): can't find rtm.exe)
|
|
(...) English (en) as spoken in Australia (AU)! Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Replacing lost instructions
|
|
(...) Depends on the set, and how old. S&H Customer service has replaced a few for me dating back to '93. Also, they have quite a few sticker sets, too. I recently got a 6539 sticker set. Call Customer Service... Ya' never know! Eric (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | When are we going to see a "Work in Progress" copy?
|
|
With all the great ideas flowing here, I hope we are going to see a draft copy of this thang soon... :-) Greg (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Replacing lost instructions
|
|
Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote in message news:372F1DAC.2AA184...ies.com... (...) question to (...) lines of (...) service (...) Did you try kl.net/scans? not sure of the exact address off the top of my head, try (URL) The Jolly Jingoist (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Replacing lost instructions
|
|
hry www.kl.net/scans/. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Progress so far, and a new header
|
|
(...) Well, there was no .pun group at the time. Sorry. :-) (...) Sounds like you have it under control. :) --Todd (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET directory structre?
|
|
(...) Okay, I'll start working with that assumption. (...) Do you have a working list of non-ng directories? (...) I uploaded it to my Web site. (URL) unzip it with directories. This is the raw, unadulterated FAQ source, so it's not very pretty. The (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: New LUGNET directory structre?
|
|
(...) Yeah. The new directory structure isn't really new; that is, it's a new way of looking at (viewing) things, but it's the same structure as the ng's, in an almost one-to-one correspondence. The only difference is that there are more directories (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.faq)
|
