 | | Re: SpringBrick: A hypothetical LEGO convention —James Trobaugh
|
| | | (...) I'm with you on this, what I loved most about Brickfest was haning out with all the people. Getting to talk face to face with people that I only know via the computer. I love it when I travel to a LEGO friendly town and get a chance to have a (...) (17 years ago, 23-Oct-07, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: SpringBrick: A hypothetical LEGO convention —Michael Huffman
|
| | | | (...) I've been looking at the LEGO convention model, listening to the on-line criticism thinking to myself that some of the points are very valid. How do you hold a convention without holding a public day? And how do you run it more closer to a (...) (17 years ago, 24-Oct-07, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SpringBrick: A hypothetical LEGO convention —Ted Godwin
|
| | | | (...) This line of reasoning is driving me batty. Money taken in from a public display is not "profit". As part of the overall budget it is simply revenue that helps pay for the event. If you don't mind paying X amount more per event attendee then (...) (17 years ago, 24-Oct-07, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: SpringBrick: A hypothetical LEGO convention —Michael Huffman
|
| | | | (...) True. And that line of reasoning has driven me batty as well. And for better or worse, what some people in the community are pushing for is a type of Sarbanes-Oxley Act for events, or accountability at some level. Some people come at (...) (17 years ago, 24-Oct-07, to lugnet.events, FTX)
|
| | | | |
