To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 682
681  |  683
Subject: 
Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Fri, 10 Dec 1999 21:12:34 GMT
Viewed: 
481 times
  
In lugnet.general, John Neal writes:


Eric Kingsley wrote:

<snip>

Just don't dumb things down for girls.

Your spin on TLC's marketing to girls is interesting.  Although you and your • wife
find it objectionable, I and my daughter don't.  In fact, I would say that the
vast majority like it, or otherwise TLC wouldn't have invested so much into • it.

I may be wrong, but I think that their market research has discovered that • girls
would rather play with midi and maxifigs, rather than minifigs.  Boys would • rather
play with the space ships and vehicles *for* minifigs.  Witness the • unsuccessful
Paradisa line.  The only people who seem to like it are Art Deco and Miami • Vice
fans;-)

   Well, the midi / maxi -figs part for girls might be true, but unsuccessful
paradisa line?
   Maybe it's just me, but I was between the 7-12 range when Paradisa was
marketed, and I loved it (and I still like it). My favorite sets (though I did
not own them) were the house with the pool, and the beach cafe`. I owned
Cabana beach (a dock with a surfer, a boat, etc.) and a playground. If I
recall correctly, pink was NOT what attracted me to the sets. The buildings
did that - normal, relaxed situations, but still with as much playability as
space or castle! (Personally, I also liked castle at that age, and I wanted (I
still do...) the 4558 train.)

Boys' and girls' tastes are different.  Expecting them to enjoy the same • themes
IMO is unreasonable.  I think TLC figured this out long ago and hence the
divergence of marketing strategies for boys and girls.

   I don't think that the issue is that girl's tastes are different than
boy's, but that girl's *interests* are different than boy's. This may seem the
same thing, but it's not - most 5-12 girls I know like blue and purple as
favorite colors, only a few like pink. But even if they did like pink the
best, that wouldn't matter at all!
   I just asked my sister and neighbor (girls, ages 10 and 7) what stuff they
would like to build the most. The answers were: Houses (my sis), spaceships
(!!) (neighbor). Also, I asked my sister what she would buy if she could
choose from a) a green house or b) a purple (her favorite color) spaceship.
She said the house, because the color didn't matter so much...
(I know, you can't base a conclusion on two girls, but still, it sort-of
proves my point... :-)


Personally, I find elements colored trans
green, red, yellow, orange, etc. completely unusable and a waste.

I mostly agree, but decoration is a nice use...

Well, those were my (long) 2 cents worth...

-Shiri



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
Eric Kingsley wrote: <snip> (...) Your spin on TLC's marketing to girls is interesting. Although you and your wife find it objectionable, I and my daughter don't. In fact, I would say that the vast majority like it, or otherwise TLC wouldn't have (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR