 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) Just to clarify, my suggestion was meant to inspire the idea that a new hierchy be established (ie, "lugnet.lego-direct", "lugnet.lego-direct.bulk", etc), rather than skipping straight to segmenting lugnet.dear-lego. If the main group in the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) I did not mean to imply that TLC should get rid of pink. All I meant was that pink or any other color should not be the primary marketing influence for a product. I think pink is great but it should not be a requirement for a set to me (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
I would think as a minimum we'd need: dear-lego.bulk (requests to add a part to the service) dear-lego.rant dear-lego.sets (discuss what sets to rerelease, if that is ever a possibility - by rerelease, I mean the original set OR a remake like (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
Wow, what great news! A lot of people have mentioned that they would like to have bulk ordering of parts and less juniorization of the sets, so I'm not going to say anything more about that. I would like to say that what I really like with the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
3 Points 1. Well, I'm not surprised. By speaking to "LUGNet" Brad appears to think he is speaking to only US AFOL's. 2. Before promoting the Lego "brand", I'd sort the product out first 3. "we’re not yet able to handle a deluge of incoming e-mail". (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
"Brad Justus" <legodirect@lego.com> wrote in message news:FMHtE5.Kp2@lugnet.com... (...) Well. I saw your message, read it, and then sat here in a funk wondering if this could be true. So, I'm going to go on the assumption that it is. That some (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) DYA HAD some 4547 Club Cars this morning. Note I said HAD. I tried to order 10 just minutes after they showed on the site, but only got 5 :-( (at least I got 5 4549s and a TON of 4537s). Now I gotta hope for an affordable 4558 one of these (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
Brad, Welcome! This indeed is great news! (...) I for one would like to see a dedicated channel. If not here in lugnet, perhaps Lego can put something together. (...) It is definitely encouraging to hear from a company that has been so influential (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
HeyHEY! Don't get RID of the pink, just don't expect it to be THE reason a "girl" set sells. I LIKE pink for accent, as do many others. As Gary and I have noted, having pastels in ALL colors would make for a killer Miami layout. (...) -- | Tom (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: All I can say is...
|
|
(...) I don't think it's fake. Buffie Shervington of the Potomac Mills Outlet Store made veiled references to the Direct to Consumer effort in (URL) it is coming. Perhaps just a little quicker than she was expecting. Adrian -- (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
