 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) Sure they will. As long as you buy the other 99,999 that they need to offset the cost of rebuilding a tool that was probably scrapped many years ago :) Adrian -- (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) I agree totally :) (...) I think a new group is certainly warranted for this occasion. It would indeed allow a "fresh start" and open a serious channel of communication. I would sugegst a brand-new group too. (...) -- Thomas Main (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
I appauld the Lego Company for initiating a relationship with online adult consumers. I imagine that it is very overwhelming to find that hundreds of discussions about a product you produce have taken place in both the LUGNET newsgroups and the (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
(...) Not an objection, just a suggestion... Until now, lugnet.dear-lego has been used as (to quote someone else) essentially a "Dear Santa" group. No doubt there will still be times that somone wants to say (scream, whine, throw) something at TLC (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
|
I would like to see the folowing cleared up by TLG. 1.their stance on ldraw and ldrawing of parts, including decorated parts whether there are any parts that for any reason cant be done? if there are any rules about this (e.g. all parts made for it (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
