Subject:
|
Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:22:27 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Geoffrey Hyde <[gdothyde@bigponddotnetdo]NoMoreSpam[tau]>
|
Viewed:
|
355 times
|
| |
|
|
A lot of people would like to say things about grey-->bley change that would
be unprintable in a public forum like lugnet. I'm just glad that most of
them have kept a civil attitude so far, and I, for one, appreciate their
restraint.
As far as bringing back grey and brown, I fully agree with you there. But I
don't think they could lose the new brown color - they should try to make
more of the rarer colors so people can get building blocks in a wider range
of colors. In fact, I would appreciate seeing more piece choice in colors,
however, I don't think the halving of the color palette is a bad idea,
especially if they have to step the fine line between staying alive or
drowning in an overburdened color palette.
Cheers ...
Geoffrey Hyde
"Todd Lehman" <tsl@tsl.bu.edu> wrote in message
news:IAJpIL.1oDF@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.color, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > The more colors the better.
>
> By that rationale, wouldn't it make sense to bring back gray and brown?
>
> > LEGO must innovate to stay alive.
>
> Not sure how changing gray to blay is innovation.
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
