|
|
 | | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
| Wow, that's some pretty good stuff... And I can agree with you about most of it, but, liking JarJar? Are you insane? Mark (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: wishin' on a star
|
| (...) SNIP (...) SNIP (...) my wishes: (URL) & mirrored & other mixed slopes (URL) 1x2 technic liftarm-snot yay! (URL) snot yay! thanks! Jeff (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.build, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
| (...) Well, as the one who initiated the whole </dear-lego/?n=4810 Knights Kingdom rant> I feel the need to defend myself lest I be labeled part of the problem rather than the solution. I've written my fair share of </dear-lego/?n=4295 shining (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A Non-Griping Letter With Gasp! Praise for Lego!
|
| (...) Agreed. I'd like to mention: a) 4496 Tub. Same price, more actual brick material. Less 1x1 and 1x2's over the 4107. b) 10152 Maersk Ship. Amazing set, great pieces. c) The entire 2003 line. Calum (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Knights’ Kingdom™ is ugly.
|
| I'm somewhat of a lurker, but I saw this as a message I just couldn't ignore. I'll agree with Felix that the new sets, especially the Grand Tournament one, just don't live up to the old castle standards. I recall being disappointed with the first (...) (20 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
|
