 | | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
"Orion Pobursky" <orion@dontaddthis.p...ursky.com> wrote in message news:HxIx9M.q1v@lugnet.com... (...) part. (...) with (...) anything is (...) Orion: While true, your statement may be a bit simplistic. I believe the original poster was not trying (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
"Rocco J Carello" <rogue27@mac.com> wrote in message news:HxIzw6.17uB@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) has (...) and (...) kids (...) probably (...) kids (...) these (...) they (...) In my mind, this actually raises another important question... should (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) That really resounds with me. When an MOC or a design hailed by many as a work of art, it is not because of the extensive re-working or introduction of a new part. What is important is what you do with what you have, LEGO should be following (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: From the mouth of babes and just what is going on!?
|
|
After describing that whole scenario you honestly believe you had "no influence" on your kids' reaction? Everything you described sounds pretty "influential" to me. (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The Bar Does Not Go Down
|
|
(...) Well, they can patent an infinite number of new sets and instructions with the existing parts. Regarding new parts, they seem to be making as many new molds as possible lately because they don't want to leave any possible shapes available for (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
