 | | Re: what else could be done —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | <<snip>> (...) Would that use holes between the studs or right below them? Like this (URL) this (URL) both kinds? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Kleniewski
|
| | | | | "Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HAJnus.66L@lugnet.com... (...) right below can be done using 1x2 technic bric with 2 holes + 1x1 brick with hole so you know you will never see a coin with value 3 :)) 1x3 brick with 2 holes (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: what else could be done —Paul Krieg
|
| | | | | | (...) I hope not. Lift arms are great. They will never replace the technic beam in many applications. For one you could not used a technic beam with 2 plates and another technic beam on top and so forth to hold things together verticaly. Regards, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: what else could be done —Thomas Avery
|
| | | | (...) Well, I was originally thinking holes b/w the studs (for a total of 2 holes), but I suppose a 3-hole (holes right below studs) would be cool too :-) TJ (21 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
