|
|
 | | Re: Military Lego Sets
|
| (...) I dunno. If a crusaders set were available, I'd consider buying it. There isn't a clear distinction about good-guy/bad-guy in that conflict, both sides had similar reasons ("Jerusalem" should appear in the dictionary below "reason"...). As (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | ??? New Theme Proposal ???
|
| ??? New Theme Proposal ??? `Here’s an idea… (Perhaps an old one.) Instead of always commenting or complaining about what Lego ‘should’ or ‘shouldn’t’ do with regards to its new or upcoming themes, how about we (the AFOL) offer some genuinely New (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego) !
| | | | | Re: Military Lego Sets
|
| (...) That would be my guess. I believe they want to avoid anything that is classified as "In living memory". They're really pushing the boundaries by producing the Sopwith Camel, but of course that's not available via mass-distribution. And "ILM" (...) (25 years ago, 1-Sep-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Double sided plate
|
| (...) Which, if they had any sense, they patented! ++Lar (too lazy to go search and see if they did or not) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Military Lego Sets
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Marc Cook writes: (snipped) (...) The Knights and swordsman theme portays the kind of "romantic era" that we are faced with when we hear fairytales. The times of chivalry, you know... The difference is quite obvious, the 20th (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
