 | | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
(...) [ some simple math calculations about to go totally off the deep end ] If TLC has an annual revenue of $1.1B, and somewhere I recall that wholesale on TLC product is about 60% of retail, then that represents about $1.833B at MSRP. Then I will (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
(...) Many of us spend way less than that. ($500/year?). However, I think you're also far underestimating our numbers. There's 645 *paid* LUGnet members, and I'd guess that it's safe to figure there's 20x that who haven't paid. (Even if they aren't (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
[snip] (...) I ofter wonder about that myself. First... I tried, in a VERY unscientific way, to determine for myself what percentage of the Lego market we represent. Personally I spend about $5000-$8000 on Lego each year. If we multiply that by the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
"John Robert-Blaze Kanehl" <johnNYblaze44@webtv.net> wrote in message news:G3JzJv.DB4@lugnet.com... (...) posts (...) factors (...) to (...) require (...) Company (...) us (...) but (...) the (...) beat (...) and (...) What I also meant that they (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
Hello Ashley, as I must accept your decision for "juniorizing" (even if I have mixed feelings about it) I think that the result is bad for the hard-core-legoists. Browsing through the 2001 lego prospect, I badly miss more big technic boxes. But (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
(...) EXCELLENT POINT! Ironic how Many large Toy companies have been complaining that their "opportunity years" to sell to kids have declined by 50% and Lego can't beat off 20+ year buyers with a stick. Lego made a great product, marketed it pretty (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
"Ashley Glennon" <ashleyg@america.lego.com> wrote in message news:G3HsC9.JG@lugnet.com... (...) [snipped small part about time and appropriateness] (...) build, (...) I was wondering, reading those two paragraphs... 1) LEGO asks kids what they want (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
(...) that? (...) I'm (...) implementation (...) Indeed. As a player of many different video games over the years (Everything from the Atari 2600 on), the LEGO versions seem a little..... well boring. Most of them are targeted along the lines of (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Are you paying attention, LEGO?
|
|
(...) But it also depends on having people unload the cartons, unpack the cartons, put the unit packages (which are higher-priced because they have to have "eye appeal") on shelves that mostly have to be located in high-rent districts so they're (...) (24 years ago, 5-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO is listening! (was...are you listening?)
|
|
(...) That's fine -- in fact, it's great for them to tie in with other media. I'm a big fan of where they're going with the Rock Raiders and Alpha Team multimedia (in the true sense) concepts, although I think the implementation could be better. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-00, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
