| |
In lugnet.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> TLC lost its moral high ground on not modelling war toys a LONG time
> ago. • **snip**
> You can't be a little pregnant and you can't only make "some" war
> toys and not others and claim to (or be praised for) only make
> nonviolent toys.
> Sorry to nitpick - I personally love the weapons and such, but I
> have to laugh when I see people say they don't want to see tanks or
> M16's but don't mind swords and knives (or rifles).
Maybe there's no ammunition in the Lego universe, though we still have to
deal with the blades and light sabers. And I guess you could make a tank with
no ammo...
Do you suppose the new, smaller treads on the Arctic sets might foreshadow a
future treaded vehicle minifig-scale product?
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) For what? Rifles, six shooters? Why would you want LEGO ammunition? 1x1 cyl. bricks are great for multiple ammo for various applications. (...) Unless it doesn't use ammo and uses lasers, missiles, etc. (...) I know I am going to use them for (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
|
| (...) TLC lost its moral high ground on not modelling war toys a LONG time ago. Otherwise we wouldn't have six shooters and rifles (that are essentially the same today as they were a hundred years ago) in the Wild West theme. Spear = sword = musket (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
