|
|
 | | Re: Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| (...) I wonder how common problem that may be. I have 2-3 pieces (slope 45 inverted 1x2) which don't like to be put on any other part. Their 'jumping power' is that high, that it even tears the model apart until enough parts are put around to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| "Douglas R. Clark" <drclark@cinenet.net> wrote in message news:HprBvw.1yqy@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) anyone (...) the (...) tiles (...) I have a Wright Flyer (purchased from a local retailer here in Cary, NC) and I did not have (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Quality issues with part #6205 (was: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer)
|
| (...) I understand that the droop may by intentional or an inevitable result of gravity on a structure that large & thin. However, the issues I mentioned with the 6x16 tiles futher down in the post cannot, in my opinion, be intentional. When the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Problems with set 10124 Wright Flyer
|
| (...) FYI, the model is of an aircraft whose wings had significant droop. That may have been intentional. --Bill. (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: So very Good!
|
| (...) Indeed, there are always exceptions to the rule. (...) Then perhaps i should have clarified... My qualms reside with the fact that TLC has a huge selection of various pieces from years of inventory from countless system sets. It is IMHO that (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
|
