 | | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Well, I was originally thinking holes b/w the studs (for a total of 2 holes), but I suppose a 3-hole (holes right below studs) would be cool too :-) TJ (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
"Tobbe Arnesson" <StPnAtM@lotek.nu> wrote in message news:HAJnus.66L@lugnet.com... (...) right below can be done using 1x2 technic bric with 2 holes + 1x1 brick with hole so you know you will never see a coin with value 3 :)) 1x3 brick with 2 holes (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Ah! Engines! I forgot about that application, sorry! I was rather stunned somebody prefered the old ones :) /Tobbe (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
(...) Maybe it's a little selfish of me to say "I want them so I can build more engines more easily". But, if I had them I would use them! They represent the cylinders of internal combustion engines a little better than double acting do. I know it's (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: what else could be done
|
|
<<snip>> (...) Would that use holes between the studs or right below them? Like this (URL) this (URL) both kinds? Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)
|
