 | | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
(...) If you find it disturbing (I think it is!), give a short note to the Lego Company. Their lawyers will solve the problem, and the seller of the CDs will never try again to make money that way. A (not so close) friend of mine had that kind of (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
(...) I believe that eBay warns against unwarranted bid retraction or cancellation, citing negative feedback as one possible consequence. I don't know if this is still the case, though... -Adam (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
(...) only if you actually win the auction... you can't leave feedback on random people, afaik. :) Dan (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
One can always give negative feedback... 8-) /Tore (...) (26 years ago, 25-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: New scans added
|
|
(...) Oops! This wasn't actually uploaded to the scans section, it is here: (URL) had made a copy for "safe keeping", unfortunately I put it in the incoming scans folder. The other night when I cleaned out the incoming folder I assumed that it had (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: newly scanned/dig-photographed: c83usts
|
|
Ok, forget about it. most of the pictures weren't nearly as good quality as I made it sound. (although a few [2 of 12], surprisingly, were) I'm going to borrow a friend's scanner and scan these the REAL way. sorry pplz. Jonathan Gevaryahu (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
The last time I complained to Ebay about someone selling instruction CD's they sent me a form letter stating that the rights owner should join Ebay's VERO program and kill the auctions themselves. Apparently it wasn't blatant enough for Ebay to take (...) (26 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans on CD?
|
|
(...) This has come up before, and I think that eBay said something like "If Lego says that it's not ok, we'll take it down". If you don't think it's right, it wouldn't hurt to complain to eBay. If enough people complain about one auction, someone (...) (26 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Scans on CD?
|
|
Hey: Check out: (URL) like a cool collection, but I think the suggestion is that the majority of the instruction manuals are on cd (thanks to brickshelf). It just seems wrong to me to capitalize on the generosity of others -- and if anyone was to do (...) (26 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | newly scanned/dig-photographed: c83usts
|
|
I have just located an old 1983 catalog at a friends house (c83usts, in VERY GOOD SHAPE, a few barely noticible creases) I took hi-quality pictures of all the pages, including both covers with a digital camera, with 1280x1024 fine jpg compression (...) (26 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote: [...] (...) For the record Kevin, I strongly respect your position on this. -Suz. (26 years ago, 5-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) You should trade the work back to them for $500K in bulk ordered specialty parts -- and then share it with all of us member lugnuts. In all honesty, it would be fair... -- Richard (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) Forgive me if my memory is faulty -- but I thought it was you, Kevin, who interpreted a statement of Brad Justus' to mean that up to the present/current scans were okay. I think it was stated in one of those tedious threads about the Huw (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
(...) The original purpose of the scans archive was as an historical archive. (...) It would cost them well over $500K, perhaps $1.5M do do it themselves. (...) I'm not opposed to having current sets but the current policy stands unless TLC offers (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Richard Marchetti wrote in message ... (...) disregard (...) get a (...) care; (...) making (...) Exactly. If Lego has a problem they will let it be known. At the very least, how about some 1998 scans? www.brickshelf.com still says no scans after (...) (26 years ago, 4-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Why not update BrickShelf to the present?
|
|
Hey y'all and especially Kevin: If I am wrong as to some very important particular issue here, just disregard the following... ...but why don't we, or Kevin, bring the BrickShelf scans current to the present date? Its my understanding that Lego is (...) (26 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
(...) I can't save them in Word95/6.0 format since it doesn't support vertical aligned text in table cells, but you can open them with Word97, since there is no format differences between them, as far as I know. I updated CD labels with a more (...) (26 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
I don't have MS Word 2000, but the files open fine. Ryan (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | Re: CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
Any chance you can convert them to Word95 or Word97? Many of us won't have Word2000. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my employer (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.db.scans)
|
| |
| | CD jewel case design for scan collections
|
|
I've just uploaded some CD jewel case designs for custom CDs made for Lego related (instructions and catalogs) scans (many of us burn them for ourselves, don't we?) to the brickshelf gallery. They all are in MS Word 2000 format. You can also find (...) (26 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, lugnet.db.scans)
|
