Subject:
|
Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 23:11:32 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@STOPSPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
146 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> And ultimately, for the LUGNET Brictionary, the HTML pages will also be
> dynamically created and cross-referenced into other DBs in the system,
> including personal want lists and auctions, so the HTML pages will also be
> more likely to be linked to than the raw images, because the HTML pages
> will contain more useful information.
Speaking of which... I just posted my wants list. I want hundreds of
most of the items on it. Someone pointed out to me that if I could tell
of sets that had large quantities of the parts I might get better
responses.
Given the current state of things, how would I go about determining sets
that are likely to be good candidates? I know Todd and some others
answered this question by hand at one point, but now I want to do it for
every part on my list
http://mrfws1.innovation.com/~larryp/parts_want_list.html
which is a bunch of different parts.
I'd pay some nominal sum for this information if it would help shake it
loose. I am not sure how to go about determining it at this point...
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
| (...) I'm not sure I want to do them all (though the list was much shorter than I thought it would be), but here's a start, the very first on the list. Here are the sets (that I know of) released since 1992, with black 1x1 bricks, sorted reverse on (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Partsref is Moving to LUGNET
|
| (...) Well, like it says on the page, "To reference a part image, when you already know the LDraw number for that part, use the following URL format. (URL).gif" In other words, linking directly to these images is OK in this case. (...) These are (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
