 | | Re: FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
I have Robolab 2.5.0 and I tried to install SP1. The install says that 2.5.1 is required. It then searches for 2.5.1 on your disk. In my case it said 2.5.1 found and updated the software. Robolab now no longer works! This seems to suggest that you (...) (22 years ago, 18-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing - part 2
|
|
Hello All, A small update The "Fixes CLI vis in Pilot mode" dated 7-17-2002 to be applied to 2.5.2 is incorrect. It must be applied to Robolab 2.5.1. That is the error I received when I tried to apply to Robolab 2.5.2. Tufts hopefully will upgrade (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | FW: updating Robolab 2.5 - Some testing
|
|
Hello Miles and all, Here is what worked for me on the upgrade process: Number 1.) Robolab 2.5 basic release Number 2.) The CD-ROM 2.5.1 from Pitsco overlaying the 2.5 release Number 3.) Service Pack 1 applied. My version is now 2.5.2 The SP.1 text (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | RE: updating Robolab 2.5
|
|
Hello Miles, After all the help you have been to me in the past I am happy to help you. About two months ago I received a CD-ROM from Pitsco with the label 2.5.1 on it. The instructions were very simple "Overlay everything in the current Robolab (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | updating Robolab 2.5
|
|
Need your help understanding why and how to update Robolab 2.5. Tufts offers Service Pack 1 for Robolab version 2.5.1 at (URL) . What should owners of version 2.5 do ? Does 2.5 need the updates in Service Pack 1 ? How do owners of version 2.5 update (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) A myth indeed! I too have ordered from Spectrum and received prompt and courteous service. I got what I wanted within days of ordering it. They were quite helpful (and patient) in locating part numbers, even though I was reading from a Pitsco (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Re: Technic's Dead )
|
|
"TWS Garrison" <tgarrisBASSo@ISmath...urdue.edu> wrote in message [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I have only ordered from Pisco twice but both times were pretty straight forward. Call them up, tell them I want items such and such and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) Really??? that is one of the most often used metaphors for an exercise in futility. From the The Oxford Dictionary of Modern Quotations: "I'm not going to rearrange the furniture on the deck of the Titanic." --Rogers Morton (URL) Ford's (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
(...) I agree. I have had no trouble ordering online from these guys. They are just like any other online retailer. Red and blue technic beams, gears, motors etc. A bit pricey, as has been pointed out, but if they are the only source, you gotta do (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
| |
| | Re: An alternative? (WAS: Technic's only in a coma (WAS Technic's Dead ))
|
|
I'm not sure, but I think this thread has now had more name changes than a dead LEGO product line. ;) (...) Name changes (after 20+ years of being in use) are a silly exercise. For anyone who's ever known it as such, it will always be DUPLO. And why (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.dacta, lugnet.lego.dacta)
|
