 | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company —Peter F. Guenther
| | | | I too agree with the content of this message. Contrary to another post, there is a "real message" here: That there are AFoLs who respect the people who are earnestly trying to return the Lego company to success, and that not every decision is going (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company — Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | Some snippage. (...) I agree with Peter, I think excessive crossposting is something to be avoided. And I'm not the only person that feels that way. I'd also remind those thinking of crossposting excessively (for shock, for humor, to make a point, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company —William R. Ward
| | | | | (...) I just wanted my message to be seen by the people who saw his message. I didn't want to just reply to it, because it would be lost among all the other replies. Crossposting the same way he did seemed the only other option. If you can suggest (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: An alternative open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) I agree that if you wanted to achieve the same exact effect (ToS violation and all) and reach essentially the same exact audience, this was the course that achieved it. However I feel you should not have wanted to do that. (20 years ago, 20-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | | |
