 | | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) Yeah. I don't give a hoot about Harry Potter -- haven't read the books yet, and I may never do so. But this may be an advantage as when I look at the HP sets I have no expectations that can be disappointed. The sets don't appeal very much in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) different (...) rat (...) Thanks for the insight, my resident HP fan is at day camp all week, can't wait to show him these. Julie (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
<SNIP> (...) <SNIP> These are TOADS! Neville had a TOAD, and these are TOADS! Not Froggies. I don't CARE where they came form originally, they are TOADS!!!!! (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H Online Question
|
|
"r2" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:GFLrro.AKK@lugnet.com... (...) order. (...) I finally received my email, two hours after my order arrived. :) We did receive the following information. I didn't see any posting about this. "Item number (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: First True Harry Potter Pics!
|
|
(...) I agree for the most part (not sure about it being better than Knight's Kingdom, but it is definitely better in some ways). I think the sets are excellent for what most of us buy sets for in the first place: parts. It is superb in that (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.castle)
|
