 | | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) I'm glad that Jimmy said exactly what I was thinking. It seems to me that no matter what LEGO does, everyone complains anyway. Also, it would seem to me that Jimmy did read your post considering that almost your entire post was contained in (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Crusader Fortress
|
|
Very nice, Jon. You have done a fine job of capturing that desert oasis feel. Your pictures seem sunny and warm. I really like the opening shot through the palm trees. Nice work. This is tempting me to try some Egyptian ruins style building. Ashley (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) this? (...) Sigh... No one reads posts anymore. Since you didn't read it, I'll explain. The re-releasing of non-castle sets is unfair, since Castle has been beaten down so much. I complain about the Guarded Inn coming back because unlike John (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Lugnet has a problem
|
|
Lugnet has a problem. No one can have their own opinion if it differs from everyone elses. If they do, they are attacked. Read the posts that were in reply to my own, stating my discontent with the re-release of the Castle set the Guarded Inn. (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.lego.direct) !
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) That's a very good point, Anthony. And the only way TLC will triumph over collector's is to re-release a lot of stuff they are not now producing. Perhaps it's in the works. Who knows...? If they produced enough quantity of the rarer elements (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) I certainly did read it, which prompted my reply. (...) Well cry me a river. Sorry but I don't buy your idea of 'fairness.' LEGO has no obligation to treat a theme with favored or non favored status on the basis that they have 'beaten it down' (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) Tim, I think the term "sour grapes" doesn't actually work in this context -- or at least I'm not sure how you mean it. (...) Others can always do as they please. But there are several REALLY good reasons why Lego doesn't fit into the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Extra! Extra! Lego Direct to reissue guarded inn!
|
|
(...) At least five: One to build, one for parts, one ofr the stash, and two to hawk on ebay two years from now... (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | July Surprise tearing .Castle apart?
|
|
Wow, I go away for a couple days, and come back to find that not only did I miss the posting of the July surprise, but that Anthony Sava is being verbally assaulted for having a different opinion? Come on guys! Okay #1- the Guarded Inn- Eh.. I've (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Worth the wait? (NO!)
|
|
(...) <much snippage> (...) set, at a good price, and I hope LEGO sells a zillion of them. Because if they do, that will give them reason to bring out MORE Castle sets - and hopefully some of the very ones you listed. (Castle is what brought me out (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jun-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
