|
|
 | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) Yeah Josh (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) I'd heard that the LEGO selection at that TRU stunk, but I really had no idea. --Todd (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) Oh man... This must be one of those situations where a spell-checker has gone horribly wrong. If not, I really feel sorry for patrons of a store where an employee showed excrement all over a product line. I'd feel even more sorry for the poor (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:04:54 GMT, "Josh Baakko" <shi_web@hotmail.com> wrote: <snippage> (...) Working for a company that sells LEGO(1), and having talked to a rep in the past (2) I'll make this speculation. I'd say that the rep was trying educate a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001
|
| (...) I'm not saying you're wrong, but if seemed funny that Lego would show off stuff like taht and not tell you that you couldn't say anything, unless they were hoping you would!? Josh (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
|
|
