Subject:
|
Re: Catapults
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:19:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
920 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Ben Pegler writes:
> > Has anyone ever bothered to see which is the most effective of the castle
> > catapult sets?
>
> No, but I'll put my money on 6030-- not because of great leverage or
> anything, but I'm betting it's the sturdiest, and therefore has the most
> "bash potential"-- although the new catapult bucket/arm pieces can probably
> stand a good wallup too...
Now that you mention these two, my son had these set up on his latest siege
(4816 and 6030). Both types hurled a nice load over the castle walls no
problem (various 1x1 rounds, 2x2 rounds, and the odd Timmy head). We
weren't really going for max distance, but both seemed quite capable. The
nasty one was a 6030 sans wheels that my son hooked a rubber band to on the
throwing arm. Fwoosh!
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Catapults
|
| (...) No, but I'll put my money on 6030-- not because of great leverage or anything, but I'm betting it's the sturdiest, and therefore has the most "bash potential"-- although the new catapult bucket/arm pieces can probably stand a good wallup (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
