To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 3811
3810  |  3812
Subject: 
Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Tue, 28 Mar 2000 06:23:43 GMT
Viewed: 
2694 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts.  I was not very
happy with their portrayal.

Tony

Ahh, Celts!  Now it makes sense (light bulb above head)  All these years I
thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
portrayal of Celts.  Thanks for the clarification.
-Chris

Excuse me?  You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..

~Nathan



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
 
(...) Only vaguely. Scots are much more Pictish, really. No self-respecting Celt is going to strip down and cover himself in blue paint before battle. ;) If you're looking for Celts(1), you should be looking in Ireland and Wales. That being said, (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)
  Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
 
(...) No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts are niether Scottish or Pictish. -Chris (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Forestmen and Wolfpack... thoughts
 
(...) Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification. -Chris (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle)

40 Messages in This Thread:














Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR